Is the Hunger Games just another movie, again?

To those who are looking for a review of the movie, the Hunger Games, will be disappointed because this blog is about something else entirely. In this post, I will be discussing about what so called Art in the age of mechanical reproduction.

In his essay The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Benjamin Walter talks about the evolution of art from hieroglyphs, paintings, lithography, photography, to film. He also discusses about the loss of aura in these work of art. To him, the loss of aura happens because the work of art has lost its authority. “Mechanical reproduction of art changes the reaction of the masses toward art” (Benjamin). The reception toward an original piece of painting is (to Benjamin) more highly valued than the one toward films. In film, “individual reactions are predetermined by the mass audience response they are about the produce” (Benjamin). Therefore, according to Benjamin, a painting is contemplated by an individual, but an individual is contemplated by the film they watch.

For that reason, the mechanical reproduction of art, thus, is meant for the capitalistic gain of a few instead of the enjoyment of the masses. In today culture, this idea is well represented by the release of numerous movies every week. Not to mention, every summer is a race for blockbuster movies by big entertainment companies. Everything is calculated for the maximum gain. Those big companies make full use of the existing media ecology to test, create awareness, get attention, and create hype to their movies. Some has done a better job than others. For example, the movie Avatar is an example of how 20th Century Fox use various media outlets to promote the film. Different photos from the movie were “leaked” before the official trailer came out. This generated discussions from online communities. The movie producers released different versions for the trailer to add in the discussion. They even allowed the press to see 16 minutes from the movie before the official release date. Today press is no long just print. News, reviews, and anticipations are over the Internet from blogs, social networking sites, to online discussion pages. Not stopping there, 20th Century Fox also partnered with Coca Cola to have marketing campaign to promote the movie. Thus, people who do not have Internet connection and/or do not read newspaper now could see the presence of the about-to-be-released movie everywhere. The extensive use of every possible media outlet together with an actually good movie brought back $2 billion to its producers. Avatar is a movie that did satisfy the hype its producers created. However, not all movies could achieve the same thing. A few examples could be: The Green Lantern or Sucker Punch. Both were hyped up very well but the undeniable disappointment from the moviegoers tells a better story than all the flattering critics.

Even though Avatar was such a big success, people have already moved on to other big blockbusters. They always anticipate for a “better” one, a “bigger” one. I think this is the point Benjamin tries to say: would people anticipate or compare The Starry Night by Picasso to another painting? The feeling one individual developed for an original art piece is more valuable because its aura cannot be reproduced.

So, what can we do? Many people suggest supporting independent moviemakers. But why is it so hard? Why is hard for many artists to stay true to the art they love? Or is it possible for them to be big? I think there are possibilities for an art piece to reserve its aura even in this mechanical reproduction age. Many artists have already used the advanced technologies to their gain: videos on Youtube, blogs on different flat forms. The question after reading Benjamin Walter is how to reflect back on art when it has become “unoriginal?” This question could be answered through these youtube videos; viral blog posts etc. where people release their full imagination and frustration from the existing system. They do unorthodox things. The fact they have gained followers and subscribers mean that maybe the system is changing. It won’t go away, but there will be more room for both the “authenticity” and “unauthencity” to co-exist. Yet, for now, the Hunger Games will soon be just another big office movie.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Is the Hunger Games just another movie, again?

  1. scrowe1

    What a great topic you got to write on! Cinema and Art are two of my most favorite subjects to look at because they are so prolific and have made tremendous contributions to our society- and have been doing so for ages.

    Benjamin’s concept of “aura” is really unique because it’s kind of true… definitely relatable. Just as we discussed in class, there is a loss of this aura when we have long been used to seeing an image over and over again, that’s not the actual thing. I don’t disagree about the loss of an aura, but I, myself, have sometimes, if you could say, experienced less of an aura loss at times. For example, I had long seen images of the Taj Mahal in history books and on television, but when the day came I found myself standing right on those marble steps, I felt that overwhelming awe.

    Regardless of my experiences, I still find Benjamin’s theory, if you will, to be spot on. What we must now think about is what the new mechanical reproductions are that we can build today, using the stems of media(s) that already exist. We should be asking ourselves questions like, “what can we produce from the telephone?” or “where can we go from here?” We do know one thing is for sure though; understanding its relevance and place in society is the best starting point.

    Reply
  2. jessicamwhitney

    Hanh, I am so disappointed. I thought you were blogging about The Hunger Game. I must agree with your blog post. Avatar is a movie that pleased everyone. The producers of Avatar were very creative and did a great job of getting their point across. As mentioned in your blog, “they are always anticipating a “better” one, a “bigger” one” Avatar set the standards so high it is hard for any producer or director to create something bigger and better. Supporting independent moviemakers is a great idea because not everyone can afford to produce high quality work. Most independent moviemakers have great ideas and story lines. Not everyone has the money to produce a high quality movie. Thinking about your question, ” why is it so hard for many artist to stay true to the art they love?” I think it is hard because they have one idea in mind but when they start working their ideas change and they make changes that will make the piece better than what they originally imaged.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s